<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=200924570504223&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Small Business 401(k) Blog

The Frugal Fiduciary Small Business 401(k) Blog

Get the latest industry news, deadlines and tips you need to know to help tackle your fiduciary responsibility needs.

Blog Feature

Safe Harbor 401(k) | Plan Design | Plan Setup

Traditional Safe Harbor 401(k) Plan vs. QACA – How to Choose

By: Eric Droblyen
August 21st, 2019

Safe harbor 401(k) plans are the most popular type of 401(k) used by small businesses today. Unlike a traditional 401(k) plan, they automatically pass the ADP/ACP and top heavy nondiscrimination tests when certain contribution and participant disclosure requirements are met. This trade-off is well worth the cost for many business owners, who often bear the brunt of the consequences when their 401(k) plan fails testing.

Read More

Share

Blog Feature

Retirement Plan Types | Safe Harbor 401(k) | Testing

Safe Harbor or Traditional 401(k) Plan – How to Decide

By: Eric Droblyen
March 6th, 2019

Safe harbor 401(k) plans are the most popular type of 401(k) used by small businesses today. Unlike a traditional 401(k) plan, they automatically pass the ADP/ACP and top heavy nondiscrimination tests when mandatory contribution and participant disclosure requirements are met. This trade-off is worth it for many business owners, who often bear the brunt of the consequences when their 401(k) plan fails testing. However, a safe harbor 401(k) plan is not the best fit for every small business. They can cost more than a traditional 401(k) plan, but offer less plan design flexibility – making it harder for some business owners to meet their plan priorities

Read More

Share

401(k) Plan Design Checklist

Feeling overwhelmed?

Subscribe to the The Frugal Financial Small Business 401(k) Blog and receive this free checklist for help in determing the best 401(k) plan design options and fit for your company.

Blog Feature

Safe Harbor 401(k) | Testing | Fiduciary Responsibility

401(k) Contribution Deadlines – You Don’t Want to Miss Them!

By: Eric Droblyen
January 9th, 2019

All 401(k) plan contributions have deposit deadlines – and it’s up to 401(k) fiduciaries to meet them. Yet, many employers are unclear about the deadlines applicable to their 401(k) plan. That confusion can easily lead to late contributions. When that happens, there are always consequences for the employer. They range from mild (losing a tax deduction, making participants whole for lost earnings) to severe (plan disqualification, IRS and/or civil penalties). Fortunately, these consequences are easily avoided with some basic education.

Read More

Share

Blog Feature

Safe Harbor 401(k) | Testing | Plan Design

401(k) Matching Contributions – What Employers Need to Know

By: Eric Droblyen
June 13th, 2018

One of most effective ways an employer can persuade their employees to participate in a 401(k) plan is by matching a portion of their pre-tax or Roth 401(k) salary deferrals.  This is unsurprising when you consider matching contributions are like a guaranteed return on salary deferrals - or “free” money. 

Read More

Share

Blog Feature

Retirement Plan Types | Safe Harbor 401(k) | 401(k) Fees | Plan Design | 401(k) Studies | Fiduciary Responsibility

Our Top 10 401k Blogs of 2016: What Topics Were the Most Popular?

By: Eric Droblyen
December 28th, 2016

Happy Holidays from the Frugal Fiduciary! As 2016 comes to a close, we looked back through this year’s blogs to find the most read.  It turns out our most popular blogs related to the following topics:

Read More

Share

Blog Feature

Retirement Plan Types | Safe Harbor 401(k) | Plan Design

Safe Harbor 401(k) Plans: Answers To Common Questions

By: Eric Droblyen
June 15th, 2016

“Safe harbor” 401(k) plans are the most popular type of 401(k) used by small businesses today. They automatically pass annual ADP/ACP and top heavy tests and allow business owners to maximize contributions to the plan. To achieve safe harbor status, owners are required to make a contribution on behalf of participating employees. For many employers, that trade-off is well worth the cost. Here’s why.

Read More

Share