Small businesses that sponsor a 401(k) plan have a fiduciary responsibility to only pay necessary and reasonable fees from plan assets. Keeping 401(k) fees in check is one of the most important fiduciary responsibilities because excessive fees reduce investment returns unnecessarily, making a comfortable retirement for plan participants less affordable. Not meeting this responsibility can also mean severe consequences for plan fiduciaries – including personal liability.
However, many (if not most) 401(k) fiduciaries don’t know how to meet this important responsibility. This is unsurprising when you consider that DOL-mandated fee disclosures do not obligate 401(k) providers to explicitly disclose the dollar amount of fees they receive from plan investment funds.
If you’re a 401(k) fiduciary, you don’t want to be in the dark about your plan fees - the potential consequences for paying excessive 401(k) fees are too great.
There are 3 basic types of 401(k) fees and expenses:
401(k) administration and investment management fees may be paid to 401(k) providers from three sources today – the plan sponsor, participant accounts or plan investments. 401(k) fees paid by the plan sponsor or participant account deduction are considered “direct compensation,” while fees paid by plan investments are considered “indirect compensation.” Both types of compensation reduce participant returns, so you have a fiduciary responsibility to keep these fees in check.
Because all 401(k) fees and expenses reduce participant returns, each type must be evaluated by 401(k) fiduciaries for reasonableness. My advice to 401(k) fiduciaries? Make this job as easy as possible by only hiring 401(k) providers that charge transparent direct fees. It’s much more difficult to evaluate indirect fees and you’re risking personal liability when you’re unclear regarding your 401(k) plan’s fees.
Proving the reasonableness of 401(k) fees can be one of the most complicated obligations of a 401(k) fiduciary. This job is made more difficult when providers charge hidden indirect fees. Regardless of how your plan compensates its 401(k) provider(s), the process for evaluating their fees involves the same 3 step process.
The DOL’s Section 408(b)(2) rules require 401(k) providers to provide 401(k) fiduciaries with the information they need to assess the reasonableness of provider compensation and identify potential conflicts of interest.
For purposes of the 408(b)(2) regulation, a Covered Service Provider (CSP) is a person or entity who enters into a contract or arrangement with a plan and reasonably expects to receive $1,000 or more in compensation for providing services to a plan. There are four categories of CSP. These categories are described on the DOL website.
If a CSP fails to provide the required 408(b)(2) information, the contract or arrangement between the plan and the CSP is prohibited by ERISA, and the responsible plan fiduciary will have engaged in a prohibited transaction. In other words, while CSPs are required to provide a 408(b)(2) disclosure, it’s the plan sponsor’s responsibility to ensure it’s received.
CSPs must include the following information in their 408(b)(2) disclosure to the 401(k) sponsor:
For 401(k) fiduciaries to prove fees are reasonable, they need to be benchmarked. Benchmarking is done by comparing 401(k) provider fees to competitors or averages. To compare competitor fees, fiduciaries should take the following steps:
The DOL also offers tips for selecting and monitoring 401(k) service providers on its website. This list can also be helpful in comparing the fees and service of competing providers.
Bottom line, it doesn’t need to be difficult to evaluate 401(k) plan fees. Once the process is over, it should be crystal clear whether fees are reasonable or if service provider changes are in order. Regardless of either outcome, participant interests are protected and fiduciaries have reduced their liability.
Get the latest industry news, deadlines and tips you need to know to help tackle your fiduciary responsibility directly in your inbox.